Surprisingly, this subject parallels my previous post almost
perfectly, except instead of environmental science it is space science. In
Tyson’s two texts, The Case for Space
and The Astronaut Session, he had a
similar purpose even though they were clearly for different audiences. The link
between the two texts was Tyson’s call for expanded space exploration, and the
reasons to adventure to the true final frontier. The purpose was clearer in The Case for Space since it was in a
formal format, as Tyson gave rationale supporting space exploration throughout
the text by giving examples of how space exploration benefited humanity and
that we should not need conflict to fund science. However, his approach in The Astronaut Session was different, as
he built up purpose through the comical interactions between an astronaut and
comedians. Once the connection between the audience and the writers (the
comedians and scientists on stage) was strong, Tyson stated his purpose stating
that space exploration happened only because of tension with other countries
and his discontent with our motivations by saying, “I’m just saying we should
be honest with the original motivation. You can say we did it because it’s in
our DNA…. Bull-oni.”
It is very apparent that each text was written for a
specific audience in mind. I believe The
Case for Space was written for an audience close to policy makers and
people who control the national budget. Perhaps the audience has some sort of
scientific background, but not extensive, as he does not use space-jargon.
Rather, he gives examples of things that may be relatable to someone of broad
scientific knowledge, and how it applies to other fields such as education,
human health, and art. The audience for The Astronaut Session was broader, as it
was aimed bring people not involved with policy making into the ‘’conversation’’.
The text was meant for a relaxed audience, one looking for entertainment. The
only way change can happen is with support, and Tyson made a wise move in
choosing to participate in a comical speech to bring a new audience into the
field. Who knows, maybe now people will be discussing the Lagrange principle
and the birth of galaxies at the bar. I hope someday I will be able to
accomplish this with issues of environmental science; both of these pieces by
Tyson were inspiring.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.